![]() |
The Global Invasive Species Team | ![]() |
|
Previous digest Subsequent digest Global Invasive Species Team listserve digest #142
Fri Oct 28 2005 - 17:00:56 PDT
Contents 1. Broadleaf signalgrass (Kentucky, USA) 2. Four states sue the US for better invasives prevention (Nationwide, USA) 3. Updating our ESAs (Global, Planet Earth) 4. Weed poster (Nationwide, USA) 5. Info needed on OH, IN, AL, MS weeds (Eastern states, Planet Earth) 6. Literature reviews (Planet Earth) --------------------------------------- 1. Broadleaf signalgrass (Kentucky, USA) From: Mario Giazzon (mgiazzon(at)tnc.org) I'm seeking information on how to control the native broadleaf signalgrass (Urochloa platyphylla, aka Brachiaria platyphylla) preferably with prescribed fire. I have a few landowners with native warm season grass plantings here in far western Kentucky that are being completely overrun, primarily by this grass. I was hoping that simply running fire through the struggling stand would release some competition and allow the desired natives to establish. However, I don't know if fire will encourage the signalgrass like it does Sericea lespedeza. Also, when would be the best time to burn (fall, spring, summer), if at all? If you have any suggestions or recommendations, please let me know. --------------------------------------- 2. Four states sue the US for better invasives prevention (Nationwide, USA) From: Barry Rice (bamrice(at)ucdavis.edu) This is rather old news, but in case you want to learn more about this lawsuit filed by NY, CA, CT, and IL, you can read about it here: http://www.oag.state.ny.us/press/2005/sep/sep15b_05.html The bottom line is that these states are claiming the USDA is not studying suitable alternatives to prevent forest pests from being transported in wooden packing materials. --------------------------------------- 3. Weed spread on Long Island, NY (New York, USA) From: Barry Rice (bamrice(at)ucdavis.edu) Marilyn Jordan sent us a report of weeds observed spreading in New York and New England, so this is really her posting. She noted the following weeds that should be on your radar screen if they aren't already: Trapa natans (water chestnut): first siting on Long Island. Myriophyllum spicatum (Eurasian watermilfoil): spreading to new counties. Salix cinerea (European gray willow): widespread and increasing. Impatiens glandulifera (Himalayan balsam; Ornamental jewelweed): spreading. Phellodendron amurense (Amur cork-tree: spreading in Massachusetts. Aralia elata (Japanese angelica): spreading in New York. For more information on this weeds, contact Marilyn at mjordan(at)tnc.org --------------------------------------- 4. Weed poster (Nationwide, USA) From: Barry Rice (bamrice(at)ucdavis.edu) A publishing company recently contacted me with news of a weedy poster they made. Ten dollars gets you a poster 18"x24", and you get to look for the 14 weeds portrayed in the little woodland clearing. Buy more, and you get big discounts. Here at the GISI, we get no kickbacks from the company, but we just thought you might want to know about this poster: http://goodnaturepublishing.blogspot.com/2005/10/new-southeast-invasive-spec ies-poster.html --------------------------------------- 5. Info needed on OH, IN, AL, MS weeds (Eastern states, Planet Earth) From: Sarah Reichard (reichard(at)u.washington.edu) I need distribution information (state, county) for Hedera helix, H. hibernica, Geranium robertianum, and Ilex aquifolium in Ohio, Indiana, Alabama and Mississippi outside of cultivation. If you think G. robertianum is native in their area, I would like to hear that too. We have good distribution data for most other states, but those four have been difficult. --------------------------------------- 6. Literature reviews (Planet Earth) From: Tunyalee Martin (tamorisawa(at)ucdavis.edu) Ernst, C.M. and N. Cappuccino. 2005. The effect of an invasive alien vine, Vincetoxicum rossicum (Asclepiadaceae), on arthropod populations in Ontario old fields. Biological Invasions 7(4): 417-425. Few studies have documented the impact of invasive plants on arthropods. If arthropod numbers decline due to an invasive plant, those organisms that rely on them, namely predaceous arthropods, parasitoids, and insectivorous birds and mammals, could also be negatively affected. This study used stem sampling and pitfall traps to determine arthropod numbers in invasive Vincetoxicum rossicum stands and compared numbers in these stands to those of native Asclepias syriaca and Solidago altissima stands in eastern Ontario. The authors's hypothesis was that fewer arthropods would be found in V. rossicum stands. Of those arthropods collected on the plants, the trend was fewer arthropods on Vincetoxicum than either Asclepias or Solidago plants (arthropod numbers were significantly less on Vincetoxicum than on Solidago). Significant differences among the feeding guilds were also noted. For example, fewer pollen and nectar feeders per stem were observed in Vincetoxicum compared to Asclepias stands. Pitfall trap trends also showed fewer arthropods in Vincetoxicum stands. Additionally, almost no herbivore damage was observed on V. rossicum plants and although flower nectar was visible, no pollinators or arthropods visiting the flowers were observed during the study. To conclude, the authors believe that further spread of the invasive vine, V. rossicum, could result in a decline of arthropod numbers, potentially impacting animals that utilize arthropods as a food source. Eritja, R., R. Escosa, J. Lucientes, E. Marques, R. Molina, D. Roiz, and S. Ruiz. Worldwide invasion of vector mosquitoes: present European distribution and challenges for Spain. Biological Invasions 7: 87-97. The authors review the distribution and history of invasion by Aedes albopictus in Europe. In Spain, diseases vectored by Aedes aegypti are discussed and the possible health risks and spread within Spain of Ae. albopictus are presented. Work, T.T., D.G. McCullough, J.F. Cavey and R. Komsa. Arrival rate of nonindigenous insect species into the United States through foreign trade. Biological Invasions 7: 323-332. Estimating arrival rates of nonindigenous species can determine pathways or commodities where the risk of introduction is high, and if action is taken, could prevent establishment. The United States Department of Agriculture Animal Plant and Health Inspection Service (USDA-APHIS) inspects up to 2% of arriving cargo. Although this data is recorded, it is not statistically valid for estimating arrival rates. Between 1997 and 2001, a sampling strategy called Agricultural Quarantine Inspection Monitoring (AQIM), which is statistically valid (95% confidence), was used to estimate the number of arriving nonindigenous insects on cargo with a greater than 10% infestation. Twenty to twenty-five percent of cargo was inspected. A total of 29,139 shipments were sampled from air, land and sea vessels. Insects were reported 189 times. The greatest number of nonindigenous insects arrived by refrigerated maritime containers, with a new species detected in one out of every 50.5 inspections. Nonrefrigerated maritime containers, air cargo, and land cargo crossing the US-Mexico border reported a new species in one out of every 129.9, 204.1 and 370.4 examinations respectively. In refrigerated maritime containers, shipments of peas were responsible for 21% of the recorded insect interceptions. Half of the recorded interceptions for nonrefrigerated maritime cargo were from marble and ceramic tile shipments. Cut flowers accounted for 68.9% of air cargo insect interceptions. Seventy five percent of US-Mexico border interceptions were insects detected on ornamental palms (Chameadorea spp.). Analysis of the arrival data suggests that many nonindigenous insects remain undetected. The authors hypothesized that pathways with greater commodity types and countries of origin would have greater arrival rates. However, the data were not consistent with this hypothesis. Understanding arrival data enables agencies to concentrate on the commodity type that is most risky within each pathway to prevent introductions. Establishment rates have been estimated at 2 to 65%. If the 2% establishment rate is used, 34, 4, 3 and <1 species have become established in the US between 1997 and 2001 via refrigerated maritime cargo, air cargo, nonrefrigerated maritime cargo, and cargo over the US-Mexico border respectively. |
||||
Updated October 2005 ©The Nature Conservancy, 2005 |
|||||