![]() |
The Global Invasive Species Team | ![]() |
|
Weed Alert! Brachypodium sylvaticum (Huds.) P. Beauv. (Slender false-brome, false-brome)
Summary: Known invaders sighted in new areas
Brachypodium sylvaticum is a perennial bunchgrass native to North Africa and Eurasia, and has recently been reported as rapidly invading coniferous forest understories in western Oregon. Occasionally cultivated for ornamental purposes, B. sylvaticum was first collected as an escaped invader in North America near Eugene, Oregon in 1939 (Chambers 1966). By 1966, it was well-established in two large colonies near Corvallis, Oregon and since then has been quickly increasing in cover and range. It is now spreading into closed-canopy coniferous forests, riparian forests, forest edges, and upland prairies in full sun in Oregon's Willamette Valley and into the Cascade foothills (Kaye 2001). B. sylvaticum has the potential to spread throughout low elevation forests in the Pacific Northwest (Oregon, Washington, Idaho, British Columbia), and could spread into northern California too. Description:
B. sylvaticum is a caespitose (tufted) perennial grass that typically grows 5 to 7 dm tall. It tends to form large clumps or bunches, but is apparently not rhizomatous. The hollow culms (stems) are pilose (i.e. bearing soft, spreading hairs) at the nodes and sometimes over the lower internodes. Its broad flat leaves are 4 to 10 mm wide, pilose, open-sheathed at the base, and do not have auricles. The ligules (1 to 2.5 mm long) are membranous, and are more or less erose-ciliolate (Hitchcock et al. 1969). Flowers of B. sylvaticum are located on pale green spikelets that are semi-spicate (i.e. the pedicels very short or lacking). Spikelets tend to be few (5 to 10), are 2 to 4 cm long, and are 7 to 17-flowered. The awns are straight, 10 to 15 mm long, and the unequal glumes are shorter than the florets that each one subtends. The lemmas are strongly ciliate and 2-nerved (2-veined) (Hitchcock et al. 1969). B. sylvaticum can be easily distinguished from Bromus species, in that the former has open leaf sheaths and spikelets which are either subsessile or short-pedicellate, while Bromus species have closed leaf sheaths and spikelets on long pedicels (Kaye 2001). Scientific and Common Names: The common name of false-brome indicates that B. sylvaticum is often misidentified or mistaken for a brome (genus Bromus). Impacts:The long-term impacts of B. sylvaticum on native species and communities that it invades are unknown. It can become dominant in the understory of forests that it invades, forming nearly monospecific stands that appear to outcompete and completely exclude native forbs and grasses. Tom Kaye of the Institute of Applied Ecology reports that B. sylvaticum can competitively exclude other species (including endangered plants and butterfly species that depend on them) in the understory of coniferous forests it invades, and that it even inhibits establishment of tree seedlings by sequestering much-needed soil moisture. B. sylvaticum may also be unpalatable to wildlife, although there is some indication of late-season browsing by deer (G. Fitzpatrick, pers. comm.). B. sylvaticum also has the potential to change fire behavior, since it can increase fine one-hour fuel loads. Native Range: B. sylvaticum is native to North Africa, northern and Mediterranean Europe, and Asia (Kaye, pers. comm.; Hitchcock et al. 1969). In its native range, B. sylvaticum is most commonly found in forests and woodlands, but may also occur in open habitats (Tutin et al. 1980).
Range As An Invader: Analysis of the sites it already occupies in Oregon and its native range suggest B. sylvaticum has the potential to spread throughout low elevation forests in the Pacific Northwest (Oregon, Washington, Idaho, British Columbia), and could spread into northern California too (Kaye 2001). B. sylvaticum is listed on the Pacific Northwest Exotic Pest Plant Council list B, indicating that it is a wildland weed of lesser invasiveness (PNW-EPPC 1997). This classification, however, may underestimate the threat it poses to native vegetation. Reproduction and Methods of Dispersal:B. sylvaticum reproduces rapidly from seed, and although reportedly not rhizomatous, can resprout from small stem or root fragments when cut. It has also been suggested that B. sylvaticum does not maintain a persistent (longer than 1 year) seed bank in soils, but this is not yet confirmed in North America (T. Kaye, pers. comm.).
Control: Mowing or grazing treatments may control B. sylvaticum, if repeated for some time. In Europe, B. sylvaticum was absent in heavily grazed sites, indicating that repeated aboveground removal may eventually eliminate this species. Burning, however, seems ineffective, as B. sylvaticum is frequently found in recently burned sites (Fitzpatrick 2001; Kaye 2001). Repeated mowing, grazing, or burning treatments that are carried out before seed set may benefit control efforts by eliminating seed production each year, eventually exhausting the seed bank (if present). These methods may also increase the efficacy of subsequent herbicide treatments by forcing the plants to produce new shoots that are more likely to take up and be killed by herbicides. Herbicide applications are currently the most effective technique known for controlling B. sylvaticum. Attempts to control this species at the Oregon State University Research Forests with the herbicides hexazinone (tradename Velpar®) and one glyphosate formulation (tradename Accord®) were effective. Application of Accord® (which is often used in forestry practices) at a rate of 5 liters/ha (2 quarts/acre) (with surfactant Activar 90®), followed in the next year by Velpar® at 9 liters/ha (1 gallon/acre), provided good control (T. Kaye, pers. comm.). Surprisingly, treatment with another formulation of glyphosate (tradename RoundUp®) met with little success as did treatment with sulfometuron methyl (tradename Oust®). Note: Monsanto representative Ron Crockett states that there is little difference between the formulations of RoundUp® or Accord® although the former contains a surfactant and the latter does not. Thus it is surprising that treatment with RoundUp® was unsuccessful while treatment with Accord® was successful. Ron speculates that the difference reported by the OSU Research Forests for B. sylvaticum control may have been the result of different application rates or in the timing of application. References:Chambers, K.L. 1966. Notes on some grasses of the Pacific Coast. Madrono 18: 250-251. Crockett, R. 2001. Monsanto Corporation. Personal Communication. Fitzpatrick, G. 2001. Integrated strategies for controlling false-brome (Brachypodium sylvaticum): mowing, burning, and applying glyphosate. A proposal prepared for The Nature Conservancy's 2002 RJ/KOSE endowment grants. Fitzpatrick, G. 2002. The Nature Conservancy of Oregon - Willamette Valley Steward, Personal Communication. Hitchcock, C.L., Cronquist, A., Ownbey, M. and J.W. Thompson. 1969. Vascular Plants of the Pacific Northwest, Part I: Vascular Cryptogams, Gymnosperms, and Monocotyledons. University of Washington Press, Seattle. Kaye, T. 2001. Brachypodium sylvaticum (Poaceae) in the Pacific Northwest. Botanical Electronic News No. 277, 29 Nov 2001. (www.ou.edu/cas/botany_micro/ben/ben277.html) Kaye, T. 2001. Institute for Applied Ecology, Personal Communication. PNW-EPPC. 1997. Pacific Northwest Exotic Pest Plant Council, List B: Wildland Weeds of Lesser Invasiveness. (http://www.wnps.org/eppclist.html). Accessed on December 6, 2001. TROPICOS. 2001. W3 TROPICOS, the Missouri Botanical Garden's VAST (VAScular Tropicos) nomenclatural database. (http://mobot.mobot.org/W3T/Search/vast.html). Accessed on December 6, 2001. Tutin, T.G., Heywood, V.H., Burges, N.A., Moore, D.M., Valentine, D.H., Walters, S.M. & D.A. Weeb (eds.). 1980. Flora Europaea, vol. 5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. USDA, NRCS. 2001. The PLANTS Database, Version 3.1 (http://plants.usda.gov). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA. --Mandy Tu/Wildland Invasive Species Team; February 2002 |
||||||||||||||
Updated January 2005 ©The Nature Conservancy, 2002 |
|||||||||||||||